NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC!

A vast array of products seen in American grocery stores are notably absent on European shelves. This is not due to a lack of international trade but rather stringent food safety regulations in the European Union.

Many popular American foods are banned in Europe due to concerns about health risks and the presence of harmful ingredients.

In this blog, we will explore these banned foods, delve into the reasons behind their prohibition, and discuss the potential health hazards they pose.

10 American Foods Banned In Europe

Chicken
Banned because: American chickens are often washed with chlorine to kill bacteria. This practice is prohibited in the EU due to concerns about unsanitary farming practices and potential health risks.
Pork
Banned because: American pork often contains ractopamine, a growth-promoting hormone. This additive is banned in 160 countries, including EU nations, due to potential health risks
Farm-raised salmon
Banned because: American farm-raised salmon is often fed astaxanthin to give it a coral color. This petrochemical-derived additive is banned in Australia and New Zealand.
Breakfast cereals (e.g., Frosted Flakes, Rice Krispies)
Banned because: Many American cereals contain BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene), a preservative suspected of carcinogenic properties. It’s banned in Japan and the EU.
Ground beef containing “pink slime”
Banned because: This low-fat beef filler is treated with ammonia and banned in Canada and the EU due to potential health concerns.
Milk with rBST/rBGH hormones
Banned because: These artificial hormones used to increase milk production are prohibited in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and the EU due to potential health risk.
Mountain Dew and other citrus-flavored sodas
Banned because: They often contain brominated vegetable oil (BVO), which is banned in Japan and the EU due to health concerns, including potential memory loss and nerve problems.
Bread with potassium bromate
Banned because: This additive, used to strengthen dough, is associated with kidney damage and cancer. It’s banned in the UK, Canada, and the EU.
Skittles and other candies with artificial food dyes
Banned because: Certain artificial food dyes (like Yellow 5 and Yellow 6) are banned or require warning labels in some European countries due to potential adverse effects on children’s behavior.
Coffee-Mate and other non-dairy creamers
Banned because: They often contain partially hydrogenated oils (trans fats), which are linked to heart disease. These are banned or heavily restricted in many European countries.

It’s important to note that while these foods are banned or restricted in Europe, they are still considered safe for consumption by the FDA in the United States. The differences in regulation stem from varying approaches to food safety and differing interpretations of scientific evidence.

Consider the Potential Health Consequences of Chicken the #1 Meat Consumed in the USA

In the United States, approximately 8 billion chickens are consumed annually, which translates to about 21.9 million chickens each day. This high level of consumption makes chicken the most popular type of meat in the country, surpassing both beef and pork in terms of per capita availability and consumption (National Chicken Council) (PreparedCooks.com) (South Florida Reporter).

The National Chicken Council reports that in 2021, about 68.1 pounds of chicken per person were available for consumption on a boneless, edible basis. This steady increase in chicken consumption reflects a long-term trend where chicken has become the predominant meat choice for many Americans (USDA ERS).

US chicken is banned in Europe primarily due to the practice of chlorine washing, which has been prohibited in the EU since 1997. Here are the key reasons for this ban:

Food Safety Concerns: The EU has concerns that chlorine washing may mask poor hygiene practices earlier in the production process. The practice involves rinsing chicken carcasses with antimicrobial chlorine washes to eliminate harmful bacteria like salmonella and E. coli. While effective at reducing bacterial contamination, the EU prefers a “farm to fork” approach that emphasizes maintaining high hygiene standards throughout the entire production chain rather than relying on chemical treatments.
Potential Health Risks: Although the chlorine levels used in washing are not toxic, there are concerns that the process could lead to the formation of potentially harmful byproducts, such as semicarbazide and trihalomethanes, if the chlorine concentration is high enough. These byproducts have been linked to health risks, including cancer, although the evidence is not conclusive.
Animal Welfare and Hygiene Standards: The EU’s ban is also motivated by a desire to promote better animal welfare and hygiene standards. The reliance on chlorine washing in the US is seen as a way to compensate for lower standards of cleanliness and animal welfare during the rearing and processing stages. The EU believes that maintaining high standards throughout the production process is a more effective and ethical way to ensure food safety.
Regulatory Differences: The ban reflects broader regulatory differences between the US and the EU. The EU’s stringent regulations on food safety and animal welfare contrast with the US’s more lenient approach, which allows practices like chlorine washing. This regulatory divergence has been a significant point of contention in trade negotiations between the two regions.

In summary, the EU’s ban on US chicken is driven by a combination of food safety concerns, potential health risks, and a commitment to higher animal welfare and hygiene standards throughout the food production process.

We strive to give you all the information so you are better able to make an informed decision for yourself.

The Pros and Cons of Chlorine Washing

Advantages:

Effectiveness: Chlorine is highly effective at killing a wide range of microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, and fungi. It is commonly used in concentrations of 50 to 200 parts per million (ppm) for sanitizing food contact surfaces and equipment.
Cost-Effective: Chlorine is relatively inexpensive and widely available, making it a cost-effective option for large-scale food processing operations.

Disadvantages:

By-Products: Chlorine can react with organic matter to form potentially harmful by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and chlorates, which are associated with health risks like cancer.
Regulatory Restrictions: Due to concerns about these by-products and overall food safety, chlorine-washed chicken is banned in the European Union and the United Kingdom.
Corrosiveness: High concentrations of chlorine can be corrosive to equipment and harmful to workers if not handled properly.

Alternative Disinfection Methods

Peracetic Acid (PAA)

Effectiveness: PAA is effective against a broad spectrum of microorganisms and does not form harmful by-products like chlorine. It is used in concentrations of 80 mg/L and has been shown to be as effective as chlorine in maintaining microbial quality of fresh-cut vegetables.
Advantages: PAA breaks down into non-toxic by-products (acetic acid and water), making it a safer alternative in terms of chemical residues.
Disadvantages: PAA can be more expensive than chlorine and may require different handling and storage protocols.

Ozone

Effectiveness: Ozone is a powerful oxidizing agent that can effectively kill bacteria, viruses, and fungi. It is particularly useful for disinfecting water and food surfaces.
Advantages: Ozone leaves no chemical residues and decomposes into oxygen, making it an environmentally friendly option.
Disadvantages: Ozone can be unstable and requires on-site generation, which can increase operational costs. It can also be harmful to workers if not properly controlled.

Ultraviolet (UV) Light

Effectiveness: UV light is effective at inactivating microorganisms by damaging their DNA. It is commonly used for surface disinfection and in water treatment.
Advantages: UV treatment does not involve chemicals and leaves no residues. It is quick and can be applied continuously.
Disadvantages: UV light is only effective on exposed surfaces and does not penetrate opaque materials. Its effectiveness can be reduced by the presence of organic matter.

Electrolyzed Water

Effectiveness: Electrolyzed water, produced by passing an electric current through a salt solution, generates hypochlorous acid, which is effective against a wide range of pathogens.
Advantages: This method is safe, leaves minimal residues, and can be generated on-site, reducing the need for chemical storage.
Disadvantages: The initial setup cost for electrolyzed water systems can be high, and the solution’s effectiveness can be influenced by the presence of organic matter.

Hydrogen Peroxide

Effectiveness: Hydrogen peroxide is a strong oxidizer that can effectively kill microorganisms. It is often used in combination with other treatments like UV light.
Advantages: It breaks down into water and oxygen, leaving no harmful residues. It can be used on a variety of surfaces and food products.
Disadvantages: High concentrations can be corrosive and harmful to workers. It may also require longer contact times for effective disinfection.

Summary

While chlorine washing is effective and cost-efficient, its potential to form harmful by-products and regulatory restrictions in certain regions make it less desirable compared to alternatives like peracetic acid, ozone, UV light, electrolyzed water, and hydrogen peroxide. Each alternative has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of method depends on specific needs, safety considerations, and regulatory compliance.

Insiders Health Tip

To avoid consuming foods that are banned in Europe while in the US, there are several alternatives you can consider:

Chicken:
Instead of chlorine-washed chicken, opt for organic or free-range chicken. These are typically raised without the use of antibiotics or chlorine washes. You can also look for chicken labeled as “air-chilled” rather than water-chilled, which avoids the chlorine washing process.
Pork:
Choose pork labeled as “ractopamine-free” or “no added hormones.” Organic pork is also a good alternative, as it’s raised without growth hormones or antibiotics.
Farm-raised salmon:
Opt for wild-caught salmon instead of farm-raised. Wild salmon naturally obtain their pink color from their diet and don’t require artificial coloring additives.
Breakfast cereals:
Look for organic or natural cereals that don’t contain artificial colors or preservatives like BHT. Many health food stores offer European-style cereals that comply with EU regulations.
Bread and baked goods:
Choose organic bread or those made with simple, recognizable ingredients. Avoid products containing potassium bromate or azodicarbonamide. Alternatively, you can bake your own bread at home. To make your own sourdough bread follow @lady.soursdough on Instagram for recipes and baking methods
Milk:
Choose organic milk or milk labeled as “rBST-free” or “rBGH-free” to avoid artificial growth hormones.
Soft drinks:
Opt for natural sodas or sparkling water flavored with real fruit juice instead of those containing brominated vegetable oil (BVO) or artificial colors.
Snacks and candies:
Choose organic or natural versions of snacks and candies that don’t contain artificial colors or preservatives. Look for products made with natural food coloring derived from fruits and vegetables.
Non-dairy creamers:
Use natural alternatives like almond milk, oat milk, or organic half-and-half instead of non-dairy creamers containing partially hydrogenated oils. Best alternative is to make your own almond or oat milk. We suggest purchasing the almond cow (https://almondcow.co/)
Condiments:
Make your own sauces and dressings at home using natural ingredients, or choose organic versions that don’t contain artificial preservatives or colors.

When shopping, focus on whole, unprocessed foods and read ingredient labels carefully. Look for products labeled as organic, non-GMO, or those specifically stating they don’t contain banned additives. Shopping at health food stores or farmers’ markets can also help you find alternatives that align more closely with European food standards.Remember that while these alternatives may not be exact replicas of the banned foods, they offer healthier options that are more in line with European food safety standards.